The modified HT with a broadband field strength meter
paired with the AD8307-based field strength meter
mentioned and linked in the article, below.
Click on the image for a larger version.
This property can be mitigated somewhat by preceding the input of the meter with a simple tuned RF stage and, in most cases, this is adequate for finding (very) nearby transmitters. A simple tuned circuit does have its limitations, however:
- It is only broadly selective. A simple, single-tuned filter will have a response encompassing several percent (at best) of the operating frequency. This means that a 2 meter filter will respond to nearly any signal near or within to the 2 meter band.
- A very narrow filter can be tricky to tune. This isn't usually too much of a problem as one can peak on the desired signal (if it is close enough to register) or use your own transmitter (on the same or nearby frequency) to provide a source of signal on which the filter may be tuned.
- The filter does not usually enhance the absolute (weak signal) sensitivity unless an amplifier is used.
Another possibility is to modify an existing receiver so that an external signal level meter with much greater range may be connected.
Picking a receiver:
When I decided to take this approach I began looking for a 2 meter (the primary band of interest) receiver with these properties:
- It had to be cheap. No need to explain this one!
- It had to be synthesized. It's very helpful to be able to change frequencies.
- Having a 10.7 MHz IF was preferable. The reasons for this will become apparent.
- It had to have enough room inside it to allow the addition of some extra circuitry to allow "picking off" the IF signal. After all, that's the entire point of this exercise.
- It had to be easy to use. Because one may not use this receiver too often, it's best not to pick something overly complicated and would require a manual to remind one how to do even the simplest of tasks.
- The radio would still be a radio. Another goal of the modification was that the radio had to work exactly as it was originally designed after you were done - that is, you could still use it as a transceiver!
- The Henry Tempo S-1. This is a very basic 2 meter-only radio and was the very first synthesized HT available in the U.S. One disadvantage is that, by default, it uses a threaded antenna connection rather than a more-standard BNC connector and would thus require the user to install one to allow it to be used with other types of antennas. Another disadvantage is that it has a built-in non-removable battery. It's power supply voltage is limited to under 11 volts. (The later Tempo S-15 has fewer of these disadvantages and may be better, but I am not too familiar with it.)
- The Kenwood TH-21. This, too, is a very basic 2 meter-only radio. It uses a strange RCA (e.g. phono) like threaded connector, but this mates with easily-available RCA-BNC adapters. Its disadvantage is that it is small enough that the added circuitry may not fit inside. It, too, has a distinct limitation on its power supply voltage range and requires about 10 volts.
- The Icom IC-2A/T. This basic radio was, at one time, one of the most popular 2 meter HTs which means that there are still plenty of them around. It can operate directly on 12 volts, has a standard BNC antenna connector, and has plenty of room inside the case for the addition of a small circuit.
"Why not use one of those cheap chinese radios?"
Upon reading this you may be thinking "why spend $$$ on an ancient radio when you can buy a cheap chinese radio that has lots of features for $30-ish?"
The reason is that these radios have neither a user-available "S" meter with good dynamic range or an accessible IF (Intermediate Frequency) stage. Because these radios are, in effect, direct conversion with DSP magic occurring on-chip, there is absolutely nowhere that one could connect an external meter - because that signal simply does not exist!
While many of these "single-chip" radios do have some built-in S-meter circuitry, the manufacturers of these radios have, for whatever reason, not made it available to the user - at least not in a format that would be particularly useful for transmitter hunting.
This radio is the largest of those mentioned above and has a reasonable amount of extra room inside its case for the addition of the few small circuits needed to complete the modification. When done, this modification does not, in any way, affect otherwise normal operation of the radio: It can still be used as it was intended!
An added IF buffer amplifier:
This radio uses the Motorola MC3357 (or an equivalent such as the MP5071) as the IF/demodulator. This chip takes the 10.7 MHz IF from the front-end mixer and 1st IF amplifier stages and converts it to a lower IF (455 kHz) for further filtering and limiting and it is then demodulated using a quarature detector. Unfortunately, the MC3357 lacks an RSSI (Receive Signal Strength Indicator) circuit - which partly explains why this radio doesn't have an S-meter, anyway. Since we were planning to feed a sample of the IF from this receiver into our field strength meter, anyway, this isn't too much of a problem.
The source-follower amplifier tacked atop the IF amplifier chip.
Click on the image for a larger version.
The other choice is to tap the signal at the 10.7 MHz point, before it goes into the MC3357. This signal, not having been amplified as much as the 455 kHz signal, does not begin to saturate until the input reaches about -40 dBm or so, reaching full saturation by about -35 dBm. One point of concern here was the fact that at this point, the signal has less filtering than the 455 kHz, with the latter going through a "sharper" bandpass filter. While the filtering at 10.7 MHz is a bit broader, the 4 poles of crystal filter do attenuate a signal 20 kHz away by at least 30 dB - so unless there's another very strong signal on this adjacent channel, it's not likely that there will be a problem. As it turns out, the slightly "broader" response of the 10.7 MHz crystal filters is conducive to "offset tuning" - that is, deliberately tuning the radio off-frequency to reduce the signal level reading when you are nearby the transmitter being sought.
To be able to tap this signal without otherwise affecting the performance of the receive requires a simple buffer amplifier, and a JFET source-follower does the job nicely (see figure 6, below for the diagram). Consisting of only 6 components (two resistors, three capacitors and an MPF102 JFET - practically any N-channel JFET will do) this circuit is simply tack-soldered directly onto the MC3357 as shown in figures 2 and 3. This circuit very effectively isolates the (more or less) 50 ohm output load of the field strength meter from the high-impedance 10.7 MHz input to the MC3357 and it does so while only drawing about 700 microamps, which is only 3-4% of the radio's total current when it is squelched.
A wider view of the modifications to the radio.
Click on the image for a larger version.
A word of warning: Care should be taken when soldering directly to the pins of this (or any) IC to avoid damage. It is a good idea to scrape the pin clean of oxide and use a hot soldering iron so that the connection can be made very quickly. Excess heat and/or force on the pin can destroy the IC! It's not that this particular IC is fragile, but this is care that should be taken.
Getting the IF signal outside the radio:
The next challenge was getting our sampled 10.7 MHz IF energy out of the radio's case. While it may be possible to install another connector on the radio somewhere, it's easiest to use an existing connector - such as the microphone jack.
One of the goals of these modifications was to retain complete function of the radio as if it were a stock radio, so I wanted to be sure that the microphone jack would still work as designed, so I needed to multiplex both the microphone audio (and keying) and the IF onto the tip of the microphone connector as I wasn't really planning to use the signal meter and a remote microphone at the same time. Because of the very large difference in frequencies (audio versus 10.7 MHz) it is very easy to separate the two using capacitors and an inductor: The 10.7 MHz IF signal is passed directly to the connector with the series capacitor while the 10.7 MHz IF signal is blocked from the microphone/PTT line with a small choke: Anything from 4.7uH to 100uH will work fine.
The modifications at the microphone jack.
Click on the image for a larger version.
The buffered IF signal is conducted to the microphone jack using some small coaxial cable: RG-174 type will work, but I found some slightly smaller coax in a junked VCR. To make the connections, the two screws on the side of the HT's frame were removed, allowing it to "hinge" open, giving easy access to the microphone connector. The existing microphone wire connected to the "tip" connection was removed and the choke was placed in series with it, with the combination insulated with some heat-shrinkable tubing.
The coax from the buffer amp was then connected directly to the "tip" of the microphone connector. One possible coax routing is shown in Figure 4 but note that this routing prevents the two halves of the chassis from being fully opened in the future unless it is disconnected from one end. If this bothers you, a longer cable can be routed so that it follows along the hinge and then over to the buffer circuit. Note: It is important to use shielded cable for this connection as the cable is likely to be routed past the components "earlier" in the IF strip and instability could result if there is coupling.
Interfacing with the Field Strength meter:
Using RG-174 type coaxial cable, an adapter/interface cable was constructed with a 2.5mm connector on one end and a BNC on the other. One important point is that a small series capacitor (0.001uF) is required in this line somewhere as a DC block on the microphone connector: The IC-2A/T (like most HTs) detects a "key down" condition on the microphone by detecting a current flow on the microphone line and this series capacitor prevents current from flowing through the 50 ohm input termination on the field strength meter and "keying" the radio.
Dealing with L.O. leakage:
As soon as it was constructed I observed that even with no signal, the field strength meter showed a weak signal (about -60 to -65 dBm) present whenever the receiver was turned on, effectively reducing sensitivity by 20-25 dB. As I suspected when I first noticed it, this signal was coming from two places:
- The VHF local oscillator. On the IC-2A/T, this oscillator operates 10.7 MHz lower than the receive frequency.
- The 2nd IF local oscillator. On the IC-2A/T this oscillator operates at 10.245 MHz - 455 kHz below the 10.7 MHz IF as part of the conversion to the second IF.
The inline 10.7 MHz bandpass using filter using a ceramic
filter. The diagram for this may be seen in the upper-right
corner of Figure 6, below.
Click on the image for a larger version.
The precise type of filter is not important as they will typically have a bandpass that is between 150 kHz and 300 kHz wide (depending on the application) at their -6 dB points and will easily attenuate the 10.245 MHz local oscillator signal by at least 30 dB. With this bandwidth it is possible to use a 10.7 MHz filter (which, themselves, vary in exact center frequency) for some of the "close - but not exact" IF's that one can often find near 10.7 MHz like 10.695 or 10.75 MHz. The only "gotcha" with these ceramic filters is that their input/output impedances are typically in the 300 ohm area and require a (very simple) matching network (an inductor and capacitor) on the input and output to interface them with a 50 ohm system. The values used for matching are not critical and the inductor, ideally around 1.8uH, could be anything from 1.5 to 2.2 uH without much impact of performance other than a very slight change in insertion loss.
While this filter could have been crammed into the radio, I was concerned that the L.O. leakage might find its way into the connector somehow, bypassing it. Instead, this circuit was constructed "dead bug" on a small scrap of circuit board material with sides, "potted" in thermoset ("hot melt") glue and it can covered with electrical tape, heat shrink tubing or "plastic dip" compound, with the entire circuit installed in the middle of the coax line (making a "lump.") Alternatively, this filter could have been installed within the field strength meter itself, either on its own connector or sharing the main connector and being switchable in/out of the circuit.
Operation and use:
When using this system, I simply clip the radio to my belt and adjust it so that I can listen to what is going on.
There's approximately 30 dB of processing gain between the antenna to the 10.7 MHz IF output - that is, a -100 dBm signal on the antenna on 2 meters will show up as a -70 dBm signal at 10.7 MHz. What this means is that sub-microvolt signals are just detectable at the bottom end of the range of the Field Strength meter. From a distance, a simple gain antenna such as a 3-element "Tape Measure Yagi" (see the article "Tape Measure Beam Optimized for Direction Finding - link) will establish a bearing, the antenna's gain providing both an effective signal boost of about 7dB (compared to an isotropic) and directivity.
While driving about looking for a signal I use a multi-antenna (so-called) "Doppler" type system with four antennas being electrically rotated to get the general bearings with the modified IC-2AT being the receiver in that system. With the field strength meter connected I can hear its audio tone representing the signal strength without need to look at it. As I near the signal source and the strength increases, I have both the directional indication and the rising pitch of the tone as dual confirmation that I am approaching it.
The major advantage of using the HT as tunable "front end" of the field strength meter means that the meter has greatly enhance selectability and sensitivity - but this is not without cost: As noted before, this detection system will begin to saturate at about -40 dBm, fully saturating above -35 dBm - which is a "moderately strong" signal. In "hidden-T" terms, it will "peg" when within a hundred feet or so of a 100 mW transmitter with a mediocre antenna.
When the signals become this strong, you can do one of several things:
- Detune the receiver by 5, 10, 15 or even 20 kHz. This will reduce the sensitivity by moving the signal slightly out of the passband of the 10.7 MHz IF filters. This is usually a very simple and effective technique, although heavy modulation can cause the signal strength readings to vary.
- Add attenuation to the front-end of the receiver. The plastic case of the IC-2A/T is quite "leaky" in terms of RF ingress, but it is good enough for a 20 dB inline attenuator to work nicely and will thus extend usable range to -20 to -15 dBm. Although I have not tried it, an "offset attenuator" may extend this even further.
- When you are really close to the transmitter being sought you can forgo the receiver altogether, connecting the antenna directly to the field strength meter!
What to use as the field-strength meter:
The field strength meter used is one based on the Analog Devices AD8307 which is useful from below 1 MHz to over 500 MHz, providing a nice, logarithmic output over a range that goes below -70dBm to above +10dBm. It is, however, broad as the proverbial "barn door" and the combination of this fact and that its sensitivity of "only" -70dBm is nowhere near enough to be useful with weak signals - especially if there are any other radio transmitters nearby - including radio and TV stations within a few 10s of miles/kilometers. The integration of this broadband detector with the narrowband, tuneable receiver IF along with its gain makes for a complete system useful for signals that range from weak to strong.
The description of an audible field-strength meter may be found on the web page of the Utah Amateur Radio club in another article that I wrote, linked here: Wide Dynamic Range Field Strength Meter - link. One of the key elements of this circuit is that it includes an audio oscillator with a pitch that increases in proportion with the dB indication on the meter, allowing "eyes-off" assessment of the signal strength - very useful while one is walking about or in a vehicle.
There are also other web pages that describe the construction of an AD8307-based field strength meter (look for the "W7ZOI" power meter as a basis for this type of circuit) - and you can even buy pre-assembled boards on EvilBay (search on "AD8307 field strength meter"). The downside of most of these is that they do not include an audible signal strength indication to allow "eyes off" use, but this circuit could be easily added, adapted from that in the link above.
Another circuit worth considering is the venerable NE/SA605 or 615 which is, itself, a stand-alone receiver. Of interest in this application is its "RSSI" (Receive Signal Strength Indicator) circuit which has both good sensitivity, is perfectly suited for use at 10.7 MHz, has a nice logarithmic response and a wide dynamic range - nearly as great as the AD8307. Exactly how one would use just the RSSI pin of this chip is beyond the scope of this article, but information on doing this may be found on the web in articles such as:
- NXP Application note AN1996 - link (see figure 13, page 19 for an example using the RSSI function only)
- At first, I considered using the earphone jack for interfacing to the 10.7 MHz IF, but quickly realized that this would complicate things if I wanted to connect something to the jack (such as pair of headphones or a Doppler unit!) while DFing. I decided that I was unlikely to be needing to use an external microphone while I was looking for a transmitter...
- I haven't tried it, but these modifications should be possible with the 222 MHz and 440 MHz versions of this radio - not to mention other radios of this type.
- Although not extremely stable, you can listen to SSB and CW transmissions with the modified IC-2A/T by connecting a general-coverage/HF receiver to the 10.7 MHz IF output and tuning +/- 10.7 MHz. Signals may be slightly "warbly" - but they should be easily copyable!
Comment: This article is an edited/updated version of one that I posted on the Utah Amateur Radio Club site (link) a while ago.
This page stolen from "ka7oei.blogspot.com"