When operating on the microwave amateur radio bands, narrowband modes (such as SSB or CW) are often used to maximize the link margin - that is, to be able to talk when signals are weak - and when we use microwave frequencies and narrowband modes such as SSB or CW one must maintain pretty good frequency stability and accuracy:
- Stability is important as a drift of even a few hundred Hz at the operating frequency (in the GHz range!) can affect intelligibility of voice - or, if CW is being used for weak-signal work, such drifting can move the received signal outside the receiver's passband filter! Having to "chase" the frequency around is not only distracting, but it complicates being able to communicate in the first place.
- Accuracy is also important because it is important that both parties be confident that their operating frequencies are reasonably close. If a contact is arranged beforehand it is vital that both parties be able to find each other simply by knowing the intended frequency of communication and as long as the two parties are within several hundred Hz of each other it is likely that they will be able to find each other if the path "works" in the first place. If the error was on the order of several kHz, "hunting" would be required to find the signal and if those signals are weak, they may be missed entirely.
At this point I might mention that Rubidium frequency references (such as one described here) are also readily available in the surplus market as well that provide at least an order or magnitude greater accuracy and stability and warm up in less time than the crystal reference, so why not always use a Rubidium reference instead of a crystal-based one? The crystal-based unit is cheaper, easier to package and consume significantly less power than a Rubidium reference, and the stability/accuracy of a good-quality crystal-based reference is more than "good enough" through at least 24 GHz. When I go out in the field to do portable microwave work I'll often power up the OCXO after putting it in the car knowing that by the time that I get to my destination and set up, it will be warm and on-frequency. (To be sure, I bring the Rubidium as a "backup" reference!)
About this frequency reference:
The goal for this project was to have a "reasonably stable and accurate" reference: Based on an Isotemp OCXO 134-10 this particular unit has a rated stability of about +/-1.0x10-8 or better after it has warmed up for a while with short term variations approaching +/-1.0x10-10. In-field observations appear to confirm this stability, having shown that this unit seems to be able to hold the 24 GHz local oscillator to within 500 Hz or better once it has had 15-20 minutes or so to warm up - and it seems to be fairly stable across a range ambient temperatures from "hot" to "below freezing." The Isotemp unit - and others like it - are readily available on both the new and surplus markets, available via EvilBay and similar.
The oven module itself is rated to operate from 13 volts, +/- 2 volts, implying a minimum of 11.0 volts. Even though testing indicated that it seemed to be "happy" with a supply voltage as low as 9.8 volts or so, it was decided to adhere to the published specifications and in looking around I noticed that most readily-available low-dropout regulators (and those that I had onhand) were not specified to handle the maximum "cold" current of this oven - about 800 mA or so - so I had to "roll my own" 11 volt "zero-dropout" regulator. More on alternative regulators, below.
A "zero-dropout" regulator:
Why regulate? I noted in testing that slight variations of supply voltage (a few hundred millivolts) would cause measurable disturbances in the oscillator frequency due to the changes of the power applied to the heater, taking several minutes to again reach (thermal?) equilibrium. Since battery operation was anticipated it is expected that the supply voltage would change frequently - between periods of transmit and receive - as well as due to normal battery discharge.
Referring to the schematic, U101 - a standard 5 volt regulator (the lower-power 78L05 is a good choice) provides a stable voltage reference for U103, a 741 op amp, which is used as an error amplifier. A 7805 was chosen as it is readily-available but a Zener diode and resistor could have been chosen: If a Zener is used, a 5.6-6.2 volt unit is recommended with 2-5 milliamps of bias as this voltage range offers good temperature stability.
If the output voltage is too low, the voltage on pin 3 drops, along with the pin 6, the op amp's output which turns on Q103, a P-Channel power MOSFET, which increases the voltage and once the voltage on the wiper of R119 reaches 5 volts - that of the reference - the circuit comes to equilibrium. A P-Channel FET (a slightly less-common device than an N-channel) was used because it takes 3-5 volts of drain-gate voltage to turn on a FET and it would have been necessary to have at least 16 volt supply to bias the gate if an N-Channel FET were used. Furthermore, with the use of a P-Channel power MOSFET the dropout voltage of the regulator is essentially limited to the channel resistance of the that FET. In theory a PNP (possibly a complimentary pair arrangement) could be used instead if one can tolerate closer to a volt of dropout, but the FET was chosen to minimize the dropout voltage.
In testing, once the oven was warm (a condition in which the OCXO was drawing approximately 250 mA at normal "room temperature") the dropout of the regulator was approximately 50 millivolts - a voltage drop that is likely to be comparable that of the resistance of the wires used to power the unit. This rather simple regulator seems to work quite well, holding the output voltage steady to within a few millivolts over the input voltage range of 11.1 to 17 volts with good transient response.
"Faster warmup" feature:
This OCXO has a "status" output that, when "cold", outputs about 0 volts and in this state, Q101 is turned off, allowing R112 and R113/D102 to pull its collector high - turning on Q102 - which pulls the gate of Q103 low through R118, turning it fully "on." In this state the voltage applied to the oven is nearly that of the battery supply and this higher voltage increases the power applied to the oven, allowing it to heat more quickly. Once the oven's "status" line goes high, Q101 is turned on, illuminating the LED and turning off Q102, allowing the regulator to operate normally.
Note: When the unit is warming up, the OCXO's voltage is unregulated which means that the supply should be kept below 15.0 volts to stay within the "safe zone" of the ratings of the oscillator itself.
Does the "boosted" voltage actually help the oven warm up faster? Probably only a little bit, but it took only 4 additional components to add this feature!
It should be noted that this status line doesn't indicate that the oven has fully warmed up, but that it's still warming: At "room temperature" it takes at least another 5 minutes before the frequency will be stable enough for use and another 5 minutes or so after that until it's "pretty close" to the intended frequency and it can be used at microwave frequencies without having to chase people around.
Why have the indicator light if it doesn't indicate that the unit is actually "ready"? While this indication isn't perfect if the light isn't on, you can be sure that the frequency output won't be valid for one reason or another.
Because the OCXO itself is somewhat load-sensitive (about +/-1.0x10-9 - perhaps a few 10s of Hz at 24 GHz) U102 - an LM7171 - is used as a distribution amplifier to both isolate the oven from its loads and to provide fan-out to allow multiple outputs to be driven simultaneously. The LM7171, a high-output, high-speed op amp, is configured for a gain of 2, providing about 2 volts peak-to-peak output with the drive provided by the OCXO.
Mounting the oven:
Because this unit is intended to be used "in the field" it was decided to mount the OCXO module itself to prevent mechanical shock from affecting the reliability, frequency stability and accuracy and this was done using some rubberized mounting pillars from scrapped satellite equipment while some "blobs" of silicone were placed on the wall of the die-cast enclosure to prevent the OCXO housing itself from directly impacting it should the unit be accidentally dropped.
some oven-based oscillators have been known to become less accurate and stable if they are over-insulated and can't radiate at least some of their heat, so don't go overboard.
Like any crystal oscillator, it is somewhat "position sensitive" in that a frequency shift of a hundred Hz or so (at 24 GHz) can be observed if the unit is placed on its side, upside-down, etc. due to the effect of gravity on the quartz crystal itself. While this effect is very minor, it's worth noting when it's being set to frequency and in operation.
In other words, when you calibrate it (see below) do so in the same physical orientation that it will be when it is in use.
DC input protection and filtering:
The input supply is RF-bypassed using a feedthrough capacitor to prevent the ingress or egress of extraneous RF along the power lead. For power-supply short-circuit and reverse-polarity protection, R101, a 1.1 amp, self-resetting PTC fuse is used in conjunction with D101, a 3-amp diode.
Why not use a forward-biased diode for reverse-polarity protection? If you recall, we are going through the trouble of minimizing voltage drop-out with our "special" voltage regulator and we could diminish this if we inserted something that caused a voltage drop - even the 0.3-ish volts of a Shottky diode would undermine this effort.
By using the "reverse-biased diode" and the self-resetting PTC fuse we get:
- A means of current limiting should something to wrong: If we accidentally short something out, the fuse resets itself when the fault is cleared - and no need to worry about not having a spare fuse when one is out in the hinterland trying to operate!
- If the polarity is somehow connected backwards, the diode will conduct and the PTC fuse will "open" - no harm done, once the fault is rectified.
- There is minimal voltage drop related to the fuse as its resistance is a fraction of an Ohm under normal conditions which means that we won't compromise the voltage "headroom" of a 12-volt lead-acid battery.
The best way to calibrate this device is to use a GPS disciplined oscillator or a known-good rubidium frequency reference. If you have access to one of these, connect the output of the OCXO to one channel of a dual-trace oscilloscope and the frequency reference to the other, triggering on one of two signals - it really doesn't matter which one.
Note: If you have an analog dual-trace oscilloscope with sufficient bandwidth you can use the "X/Y" mode to produce a Lissajous pattern (obligatory Wikipedia reference here) - but this doesn't always work well on modern, digital scopes when high frequencies are involved due to sample aliasing.
Adjusting the 'scope to see one of the waveforms, one should see a stationary wave (the one on which the 'scope is triggered) while the other will be "sliding" past the first. Adjust the OCXO's frequency (after the OCXO has warmed up for at least 30 minutes - preferably more) while it is sitting in the same physical orientation in which it will be used as this can (slightly) affect frequency. It is suggested that the cover of the enclosure containing this circuitry be left on except during the brief periods to access the 10-turn potentiometer unless provisions are made to access it (via a hole) from outside the box.
The OCXO's frequency is then adjusted to minimize the rate at which the two sine waves are moving with respect to each other: It's sometimes easier to make this adjustment if the 'scope is adjusted to that the two waves are atop each other and about the same size. With careful adjustment it should be possible to get two waveforms that take more than 10 seconds to "slide" past each other - maybe longer. The Isotemp OCXO noted should, in theory, be able to hold to that "10 second" slide rate over a wide variety of temperature conditions.
If you don't happen to have access to a rubidium reference or a GPS Disciplined oscillator, you can do "reasonably" well by zero-beating the 10 MHz output with the signal from WWV or WWVH, be note that Doppler shifts can cause their apparent frequencies to shift by 1 Hz or more. I'll leave the explanation of methods of successfully zero-beating an off-air signal to others on the GoogleWeb.
The best time to attempt this is when you are hearing only one of these two stations (assuming that you can ever hear them both) and when it's signal is the most "solid" - that is, it's fading in and out is at minimum. Often, the worst time to make this sort of measurement is when any part of the radio path between you and WWV (or WWVH) is within a hour or two of sunrise or sunset as this is when the ionospheric layers are in a state of flux. If you are hearing both WWV and WWVH, don't try this as the two frequencies and signal strength will not likely be consistent and the results will probably be confusing.
If you don't happen to live in an area where you have a reasonable signal from WWV or WWVH then I'd suggest you ask around to find someone who has appropriate gear to help with this task.
Comments about alternative schemes for low-dropout regulation for the OCXO:
There are a number of "low-dropout" adjustable regulator ICs on the market that may be suitable for your this project - but there are a few caveats.
For example, there is the Linear Technologies LT1086-Adj which is rated for up to 1.5 amps of current. While much lower dropout than a conventional adjustable regulator such as an LM317, it does have approximately 1 volt of dropout which means that if you set the OCXO's supply voltage to 11.0 volts - the minimum recommended in the OCXO's specification - your battery voltage must be at least 12.0 volts: While this represents a lead-acid battery that mostly depleted it is likely that a small, but healthy, lead acid could drop to such a voltage under transmit load - particularly if the resistance of power leads is taken into account. This 3-terminal regulator is used in a manner very similar to the LM317 - except that you really must have some good quality, low-ESR capacitors (probably tantalum) very close to the regulator itself - see the data sheet.
Also made by Linear Technologies is the LT1528 that is rated for up to 3 amps that has a (nominal) 0.6 volts of dropout - more typically in the 0.3 to 0.5 volt area for the amount of current consumed by the OCXO, particularly once it has warmed up: This extra margin would keep one in the "safe" region of the OCXO's operating voltage range down to around 11.5 volts allowing both "deeper" battery discharge and more voltage drop on connecting wires. This part is somewhat more complicated to use than the LT1086, above, but it is, overall, simpler than the op-amp based regulator described earlier in this page.
If the "fast warmup" were to be implemented on either of the above regulators it would take a different form than the above - likely using several resistors and a transistor or two to "switch" the resistor-programmed voltage setting to something higher than the normal voltage.
There are a number of other, similar, low-dropout regulators that are made by different manufacturers, but very few have as low dropout (e.g. about 50 millivolts) as the simple FET/Op-amp circuit described on this page.
- It is recommended that one not use a switching regulator to power the OCXO unless
it has been extremely well filtered and bypassed. Unless such a regulator is a buck-boost type, it will probably have a higher drop-out voltage than even a standard low-dropout linear regulator. Because of the rather low overhead voltage involved, there is not much loss in the linear regulator, anyway - only 10-15% or so with a 12.5 volt supply.
- If you are interested in an example of this project being built with an etched PC board with surface-mount parts, visit VK4ABC's 10 MHz OCXO Web Page.
* * *
This is a revised version of one of my web pages, the original being found at http://www.ka7oei.com/10gig/10meg_oven_1.html
This page stolen from ka7oei.blogspot.com
Note: This post is partially an attempt to test means of reducing the "scraping" of content of this blog by sites such as "rssing", who seem to "swipe" content and "load" search engines' result with unwary readers NOT ending up at my page. xe2XV6SJ9914C50H08S8 QY2IU7TU0C11c57804Q8